AGENDA
- Mill's advice
- Life satisfaction view
- Preview: exam coming up Feb 18
_________________________
Epictetus--basically a life coach, lots of advice
Mill --if he were a life coach, what would he advise?
_________________________
Famous passage
"It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. And if the fool, or the pig, are a different opinion, it is because they only know their own side of the question. The other party to the comparison knows both sides." (Mill, para 6)
Mill: don't be distracted by satisfaction. THAT isn't happiness.
Leads us to the next view....
_________________________
Christine Vitrano--
- contemporary philosopher, author of The Nature and Value of Happiness
- Happiness is all that matters (so she's a hedonist, like Mill)
- But what is happiness? Not pleasure, but rather feeling satisfied with your life
Many formulations (p. 104)--
- A person is happy if "she is disposed, when she considers her life, to feel satisfied, which means she judges that her expectations are being attained"
- One is happy if "one likes those parts of one's total life patterns and circumstances that one thinks are important"
- Happiness is "having a favorable attitude toward whatever relationship one happens to have to one's circumstances"
- Happiness is "being pleased with one's happiness as a whole"
- "The happy person has a favorable impression, attitude, or perception of her life"
Vitrano--life satisfaction is both a judgment and a feeling
_________________________
Why does she prefer the life satisfaction view instead of the pleasure view? (earlier in her book)
- pleasure goes up and down all the time
- life satisfaction is more stable
- happiness is something pretty stable
- so happiness = life satisfaction
- is this persuasive?
_________________________
If you say you are very satisfied with your life, could you be wrong about that?
- Mistaken if you're lying
- Mistaken if you didn't understand the question
- Would you be mistaken if your satisfaction is due to errors ????
Should we add a no-errors condition?
CASES (p. 114-116)
- Some say--not actually satisfied because she isn't actually fulfilling her own plans for life
- Vitrano--Susie really is satisfied with her life
Tom the vanilla ice cream lover. He's thrilled that he gets to eat vanilla ice cream all the time and says he has a wonderful life, but doesn't know there are 100 other flavors other people are enjoying.
- Some others--Tom isn't really satisfied because he's making a "faulty comparison"
- Vitrano--Tom is satisfied with his life
_________________________
The Arbitrariness Objection (Daniel Haybron)
Life satisfaction fluctuates in strange ways, so happiness shouldn't be identified with it
Experiments Cited by Haybron
Vitrano's response
- people report higher life satisfaction when....
- the weather is good
- they have just found a lucky dime
- they first eat a candy bar
- they are in a pleasant room
- people report different amounts of life satisfaction depending on question order
- Life satisfaction may in fact have some strange causes. It doesn't matter.
- The experiments may not actually show that life satisfaction fluctuates based on these arbitrary factors.
- Another interpretation is that the arbitrary factors distract people and prevent them from focusing on the question of life satisfaction. Like assessing food in a restaurant while hearing a baby cry.)
_________________________
Next time: an objection to ALL hedonist views (both pleasure and life satisfaction)


