AGENDA
- Recap
- Wolf objections
- Helene De Bres, narrative views
What is meaning?
- We will be looking at 7-8 different views
- By the end, hopefully you will find one you find plausible
- see tab
_________________________
Susan Wolf discussion
Meaning arises when TWO conditions are met:
- Subjective attraction: you love what you're doing, you're passionate about something
- Objective attractiveness: the thing is worth doing, it makes sense not just to you but to a wider community
Nobody seems to like this view! Why not?
_________________________
Helene De Bres (De Bray)
- Other theories (Taylor, Wolf) are not wrong, but incomplete
- A further element of meaning is: narrative
Two lives that both meet Wolf's two conditions
Choppy life -- 50 separate activities that meet both conditions, chosen on a whimCohesive life -- e.g. Tolstoy
If cohesive life is more meaningful, what is this additional element of meaning?
- Narrative coherence
- None of our authors has talked about this so far
Part 1: many possible narrative views of meaning
Part 2: De Bres's proposal
_________________________
What is a narrative? Narratives ....
- represent "the unfolding of events over time"
- display "connections between the events depicted"
- they highlight "continuity and coherence"
- "they focus on agency: the motivations of agents and the nature and consequences of their actions"
- a story has an intended significance--there's an interpretation, a point of view
Little stories, big stories
- Story of my weekend (whatever that might be!)
- Narrativists not really talking about these kinds of stories
- My life story (so far)
- Tolstoy's life story (as told in Confession)
- No Moccasin's life story (as told by her husband)
- Other life stories? People you mentioned in RR22
- Martin Luther King (3)
- Oprah Winfrey
- Elon Musk
- John Lennon
- Basshar Al-Assad (leader of Syria)
- Nelson Mandela (3)
- Jesus
- Mohammad
- Steve Jobs
- Napoleon Bonaparte
- Che Guevara
_________________________
How does a life story add meaning to someone's life? (four views)
1. "Relationism. The holding of certain [narrative] causal relations among parts of a life contributes to the meaningfulness of that life." (DeBres, p. 549)
- choppy life --no causal relations
- cohesive life--Tolstoy
- youthful debauchery --> reforms himself
- reading literature --> experimenting with writing
- crisis at midlife --> conversion
2. "Progressive Relationism. A life increases in meaning to the extent that it involves the challenging and successful pursuit of objectively valuable projects, in ways that draw constructively on the past." (DeBres p. 550)
- choppy life--no progress
- cohesive life--Tolstoy
- meets this condition as well, if you think his life story is a story of progress
3. "Recountism. Telling a certain kind of story about one's life contributes to the meaningfulness of the life." (DeBres p. 551)
- choppy life -- no recounting
- cohesive life -- Tolstoy does recount in Confession
4. "Agency Recountism. Telling a story about one's life that emphasizes one's status as an autonomous agent contributes to the meaningfulness of that life, by virtue of increasing one's sense of agency." (DeBres p. 551)
- choppy life --no self-empowering recounting
- cohesive life -- Tolstoy does emphasize his own role
_________________________
By all four standards
- choppy life -- less meaningful
- cohesive life -- more meaningful
Does that make sense?
Which is the right standard, and why? (DeBres, next time)